This is an Argumentative Essay (dated 12/2/18) by “Edward Flatt” that was originally posted on The Men’s Rights Reddit, and published here with kind permission of the author. Some minor additions have been made, with the author’s permission. Original citations at bottom.
When you think of domestic violence, what image first pops into your head? For many people, it is the image of an angry man beating or abusing his wife or girlfriend. While this example of domestic violence does occur, it is not the only example of domestic violence. Some people believe that men are always the perpetrators of abuse, and will act on that assumption. However, men can be and frequently are the victims of abuse. Due to the lack of resources available to male abuse victims, society’s attitude towards male abuse victims, and widespread sexist views towards men, society needs more domestic violence shelters specifically for men.
First, let’s answer the question, “What is domestic violence?” According to the National Domestic Violence Hotline website, domestic violence is “a pattern of behaviors used by one partner to maintain power and control over another partner in an intimate relationship”, and that “Anyone of any race, age, sexual orientation, religion or gender can be a victim – or perpetrator – of domestic violence.” (“Abuse Defined”, thehotline.org). It is not defined as violence towards women or violence perpetrated by men.
Despite this, many people believe that women cannot commit domestic violence. Glenn Sacks, in his article “What Happens When Abused Men Call Domestic Violence Hotlines And Shelters?”, writes about a conference by Denise Hines, Ph.D, who quotes an abused man as saying “They told me women don’t commit domestic violence — it must have been my fault” when he called a shelter for help (Sacks). In “David’s story,” an article from the Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria, an abused man shares his experiences and states that even his own mother said, “What are you doing to make her behave that way?” (qtd. in David, “David’s story”). Our own domestic violence shelters, created and trained to protect victims of abuse, will turn away male victims on the basis of gender. Women can be abusers, and men can be victims.
When it comes to domestic violence, many believe that men are the only perpetrators. In a study of 302 abused men by Denise Hines, Ph.D, 32% who called a domestic violence hotline were instead “referred to a batterer’s program” (a support group for people who abuse), and 25% were “given a phone number to call that turned out to be a batterer’s program.” Almost 70% of these abused men claimed the hotlines to be “not at all helpful” (Sacks). A total of 57% of these abused men ended up being directed to a batterer’s program instead of receiving the help they needed. Even though anybody of any gender can be a batterer, even domestic violence hotlines will assume it is the male.
Most statistics show that women suffer much greater adverse effects from domestic violence than men do, and more often (Straus). However, a study by the CDC shows this may not actually be the case. When asked the same questions, which is an unusual occurrence, men reported being victimised in equal numbers to women. Even so, it is easy to picture women as the sole victims of domestic abuse; shelters for women are a very important part of our society. One may argue that more shelters for men takes away from female abuse victims. I do not mean to undermine the problem faced by women when it comes to domestic violence. This concern for female victims is admirable and well-placed; it simply should not prevent society from protecting our male victims as well.
When it comes to the frequency of male victims as compared to female victims, the difference appears to immediately be clear. It would seem that women are abused more frequently than men are. However, information about abuse cases perpetrated by women is concealed from the public. According to Murray Straus, “a study of newspaper coverage of the 785 homicides that occurred in Cincinnati, Ohio over a 17-year period found that 79% of partner homicides perpetrated by men were reported, compared to 50% of the partner homicides perpetrated by women. Moreover, for cases of women killed by a male partner there was a mean of 3.5 articles, compared to a mean of 1.7 articles for men killed by a female partner.” When it comes to abuse or homicide perpetrated by women, an astonishing percentage of them are simply not reported to the public. We need to protect our male victims; covering up and lying about information does nothing but harm them.
The misconceptions about domestic abuse are engrained deep within our culture. The image of “men as abusers” is so strong that even our defenses against domestic violence give in to it. From the Arizona Coalition to End Sexual & Domestic Violence, or ACESDV, a coalition whose goal is “to end sexual and domestic violence […] by dismantling oppression and promoting equity among all people” (“Who We Are”), Barbara Hart is quoted as saying “All men benefit from the violence of batterers” (“About Domestic Violence”). This statement is not conducive to promoting equity among all people and is simply an untrue statement.
Male abuse victims do not benefit from the violence of their batterers. The ACESDV also includes a section about domestic violence misconceptions versus facts. “Myth: Women are just as violent as men in relationships. Fact: Some women report striking their male partners during the course of conflict, often in self-defense. Women, however, rarely commit deliberate acts that result in fear, injury, rape, or death”. This last statement is untrue.
According to Murray Straus, “Women initiate PV [partner violence] at the same or higher rates as men, and they are the sole perpetrator at the same or higher rates.” The untrue stereotype that women rarely abuse men is prevalent enough that even organizations against domestic abuse spread it as fact.
Domestic violence shelters are a part of society. As a society, we want to protect victims of abuse and provide a safe space for recovery. However, domestic violence shelters as a concept are geared almost exclusively towards women. England and Wales has room to shelter roughly 7500 female victims domestic violence. In comparison, there are only 60 domestic violence placements for men (Campbell). Domestic violence shelters for men compose 0.8% of the total shelters in those two countries. Men make up from 33% (Straus) to over 40% (Campbell) of domestic abuse victims. If up to over 40% of abuse victims are male, it seems wrong that only 0.8% of abuse shelters are dedicated to them.
In 2015, Taylor House, a shelter for male victims of domestic abuse, was opened. It became the “first shelter for male victims of domestic violence to be registered with the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence” (Miller). The first battered women’s shelter in America was opened in 1973, and by 1979, over 250 of them had opened (“History of Battered Women’s Movement”). The time from our first battered women’s shelter to our first male domestic violence shelter spans 42 years. From the first battered women’s shelter in 1973, to the first registered battered men’s shelter in 2014, it took our society 42 years to realize that men need a safe space from abuse as well.
As a society, we are making progress. The opening of Taylor House is a step in the right direction. However, we’re not done. Society viewing men only as abusers and women only as victims is a huge problem. Opening more domestic violence shelters for men would send the message to male abuse victims that they are valid and believed. It would provide a safe space for abuse victims who would otherwise be turned away. Abused men need more support in society and opening more domestic violence shelters would provide that.
Men Are Human Responds
Thank you for reading, and I hope we will be seeing more articles from our guest author in future. As part of our fact-checking, we delved into the website for the government-funded Arizona Coalition to End Sexual & Domestic Violence, and what we found was downright disturbing. A casual glance at the site gives the impression of an extremely clean, friendly, and gender-neutral resource – with workshops for male and female victims. They even acknowledge ‘made to penetrate’ as a kind of sexual violence directed at men – for which we applaud them. We would prefer if they campaigned to class it under rape (which is what it is), however it is legally correct to call it sexual assault.
But, dig a little deeper, and you will find out that nothing is as it first seems. Putting aside the small number of red flags dotted about, the biggest warning signs are hidden in their top menu. Most damning of all is their “Guiding Principals” manifesto – which openly, and unironically, blames masculinity for every kind of bigotry there is under the cover of attacking “a patriarchal ideology which ascribes power/privilege to masculinity while disempowering and devaluing identities and ideals associated with femininity “. This is an outright conspiracy theory centred around masculinity that seeks to remove all social blame female abusers might have, and drop it squarely onto men. We will go into greater detail on this and how it works in a later article. For the time being, you can read more about this strange ‘Gender Studies’ based language and see it in action here.
Works Cited in Original Essay
Click To Expand
- “About Domestic Violence” Types of Domestic Violence |, www.acesdv.org/domestic-violence-graphics/. Accessed 11 Dec. 2018.
- “Abuse Defined.” The National Domestic Violence Hotline, www.thehotline.org/is-this-abuse/abuse-defined/. Accessed 10 Dec. 2018.
- Campbell, Denis. “More than 40% of Domestic Violence Victims Are Male, Report Reveals.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 4 Sept. 2010, www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence. Accessed 27 Nov. 2018.
- David. “David’s Story | Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria.” David’s Story | Domestic Violence Resource Centre Victoria, www.dvrcv.org.au/stories/true-stories/stories-men/davids-story . Accessed 27 Nov. 2018.
- History of Battered Women’s Movement | Saint Martha’s Hall.” St. Martha’s Hall – Breaking the Cycle of Domestic Violence, saintmarthas.org/resources/history-of-battered-womens-movement/. Accessed 10 Dec. 2018
- Miller, Bill. TAYLOR HOUSE OPENS AND HOTLINE GOES HOT. 2016, www.batesvillefamilyviolence.com/images/newsletters/FVP-March-2015.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov. 2018.
- Sacks, Glenn. “Researcher: What Happens When Abused Men Call Domestic Violence Hotlines and Shelters?” NPO, https://nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/3977-researcher-what-hap-3977 . Accessed 27 Nov. 2018.
- Straus, Murray A. “Women Are as Likely as Men to Abuse a Partner.” Family Violence, edited by Dedria Bryfonski, Greenhaven Press, 2013. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, Accessed 27 Nov. 2018. Originally published as “Why the Overwhelming Evidence on Partner Physical Violence by Women Has Not Been Perceived and Is Often Denied,” Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, vol. 18, 2009.
- “Who We Are.” Types of Domestic Violence |, https://www.acesdv.org/who-we-are/. Accessed 12 Dec. 2018.
This Needs To Be Public Knowledge
MenAreHuman.com campaigns to raise awareness of issues just like this, but we need your help. We need people to help write articles for the site, and we are looking to create a team of people to create and manage daily content. If you would like to help, the Men Are Human team is always available through our Discord. We also need to secure our future and promote the site using online advertising, so any donations you would like to make will be gladly received. If you just want to keep up with our articles in future, please check out our Twitter. We are also on Gab if you prefer that.
The numbers in this article for total refuges / dv shelters in the UK & for refuges in the UK for men only are not correct. This article states 7500 & 60, respectively. The actual numbers are closer to 270 & 22.
Thanks for the heads up! Do you have a citation for that which I can look into?
~300 refuges total in Wales (33) & England (269 or 271 depending on link) providing 4092 beds as of 2018/9
https://www.womensaid.org.uk/information-support/what-is-domestic-abuse/domestic-abuse-services/
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/articles/domesticabusevictimservicesenglandandwales/november2019
20 UK refuge beds for men only & 58 beds for either men or women as of 2015
same organization in 2018 said there are 3600 refuge beds for women only & 20 for men only
http://www.mankind.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Refuges-for-Male-Victims-of-Domestic-Abuse-Briefing-July-2016.pdf
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/male-domestic-violence-victims-refuges-mankind-initiative-a8540346.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-45490173
this source seems unreliable:
164 UK beds for women only, 40 UK beds for men only as of some recent unknown year
https://www.menandboyscoalition.org.uk/statistics/
Do you have a link to the Campbell reference to 7500 UK shelters for women & 60 for men?
The article here is the citation. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2010/sep/05/men-victims-domestic-violence
It seems that the sentence has a small typo. It’s actually 7,500 placements for individual women – not 7,500 shelters. Oops, but not a big deal to fix it. It’s hard to count them all, but it does seem like there are around 3-400 actual shelters for women. Thank you for your links. I will look into them and see what’s what.
wow that is pretty significant & important mistake in (& throughout) the guardian article.
a lot of research that shows the %s of women versus men experiencing dv does not categorize the type of dv. mutual/reciprocal dv has much closer to a 50/50 split of those two genders. one-sided dv, with one perpetrator & one victim, has a women-man gender split of closer to 85/15 (85% perps are men). the data that supports the 50/50 split come from national surveys whereas the data that supports the 85/15 split come from agency stats (e.g., hospitals, police departments, etc). nevertheless, in the type of dv that is characterized by a dominant perp, about 15% of the perps are women, which is a noticeable %. many men who are victims in this type of dv categorization are unfortunately at a very high risk when society does not believe that they are victims.
By 15%, I’m assuming you mean after two-way violence is removed? From our studies, we mostly found that women initiated violence a lot more and were the majority of dominant perpetrators.
Yes, 15% women is only for the population of couples with 1 dominant perp. For the 85/15 split, I am citing the general landscape of research coming out of American institutions.
In some research populations, “violence” is defined by use of physical force. In the intimate partner abuse advocacy field, “violence” is not limited to physical force; in that field, violence includes psychological / financial / emotional / you name it, & also includes the threat of those categories. It is not unusual for a victim in a one-way abuse relationship to initiate physical violence, for example, as a way to defend against / preempt an attack. In those situations, the victim could be characterized as a secondary aggressor (still within a relationship with a predominant aggressor).
What study are you inciting? I’m assuming this study has been published?
There’s a fair few saying this over on the citations list. As far as I can see, abuse is 50/50.
There is something to be said, historically / considering the span of human civilization, about how violence tends to manifest in people who identify with masculinity. The vast majority of violence committed by humans was committed by male humans. Globally, human rights violations are often comprised of violence against women, perpetrated by men. Having said that, I believe more connects men & women (those genders) than divides them, & both genders are ultimately human, with human tendencies showing up in both. If you (the general ‘you’) are a victim, it does not matter what your gender is — intentional harm inflicted upon someone is wrong regardless of the gender of the perp or the gender of the victim. No one should be overlooked / discriminated against as a victim because their gender does not seem to match up with someone’s understanding of the statistics.
To be honest, an awful lot of human rights violations are by (or encouraged by) women – they just get swept under the rug. I’d say The Duluth Model, and campaigning to prevent recognition of male rape victims are two big ones.
You are obviously not wrong that “an awful lot of human rights violations are by (or encouraged by) women”. Specifically, how / when / what did people working under the Duluth Model do? I am also not personally aware of campaigning to silence male rape victims, if that is something you can elaborate on. Clearly sounds wrong & reprehensible.
We probably will in a future article, but we can’t in this one as it is an essay by a friend. The Duluth Model states that abuse is all about male power over women, and it treats female abuse of men as always being self defence. The campaign to silence male rape victims is pretty much normalised. Everything from “You’re lucky she was willing to have sex with you” to the laughter of the police and public. Calling the drugging and raping of young boys a ‘romp’. I could go on, but I think I’ll save it for a future article.
If I may describe my understanding of the Duluth Power & Control wheel–
The “male privilege” sector is supposedly what drives most of the coercive control dynamics within heterosexual male-directed violence studied by decades of Duluth facilitators & researchers.
Most does not mean all, so a portion (I don’t know what minority portion) of heterosexual male-directed coercive control is not perpetuated by beliefs of male superiority & deserved entitlement, but rather by learned behavior, childhood trauma, etc. (All these factors can also combine / mix together.)
The population of subjects that inform the Duluth Power & Control wheel (over decades & that number in the thousands) are all heterosexual couples, & comprised of almost all male perpetrators. It is thus almost a tautology that any female abuse of men, within their specific population set, is motivated by self-defense &or preemptive measures.
I think we can all agree that no matter the sex or gender, rape should not be normalized. This stance must be clear, no matter what advocacy group anyone belongs to.
The instances you reference (i.e., you’re lucky, etc) are instances of toxic masculinity, perpetrated by many people & institutions within society, & which is harmful to everyone, again regardless of sex or gender.
Part of the Duluth Model process elevates the role of the wider coordinated community in preventing, addressing, & holding accountable abusers. Indeed, the origins of the Duluth Model lay in community jury members deciding to not convict a wife who had killed her abuser husband because nobody in the community was surprised when the crime occurred. Everyone in the small community knew for years of the ongoing intimate partner violence, predominantly by the husband, & the community realized their role in staying silent when they thought, “oh, it’s just a domestic matter; it’s none of our business”. Like examples of toxic masculinity you raised, the community collusion is also an example. Events such as these hurt everyone.
Thank you for your thoughts. We don’t support the theoretical concept of toxic masculinity here, but do accept that there are men who have been socially conditioned to think over men are lucky when they are raped. We may do a follow-up article talking about the origins of Duluth and the eventual retraction of the system by its own creators. (As well as Battered Woman Syndrome, which you allude to)